I've blogged before about the Classification and Compensation study that PVLD has undertaken, and some of the management challenges that are resulting. This week the joint "employee – management" team that has been working with our consultant to complete the study met with the PVLD Board of Trustees to educate them on the methodology we are using and review the draft report prior to rolling out the report to employees in a few weeks.
As we talked about the proposed new classification and compensation structure it became painfully apparent how many of the deficiencies in our current "system" result from tweaking and bending the system to avoid having to address issues with employee behavior and performance or to put patches on parts of the system that probably should have just been totally redesigned. I use the word "system" very loosely because over the years it has been tweaked to the point that there is nothing systematic about it.
For example, in our Circulation Department at Peninsula Center our current system has very narrow and rigid classifications that limit flexibility and create staff coverage and workflow headaches. So as a general rule "Senior Pages" sort books and oversee the sorting area – but don't return books to the shelves while" Pages" shelve books but don't sort them. We don't know exactly how these demarcations came about, but one version of the story is that (like most libraries) at one time we only had Pages who both sorted and shelved books. There were issues because the Pages would congregate in the sorting room and chat. Rather than having the management discipline to deal with the behavioral issue, the classification of Senior Page was created as a quasi-supervisory position to oversee the sorting room. Now we have organizational confusion because it can feel like you have as many "Chiefs" as "Indians" and inefficiency because of the inflexibility of the structure.
We also have examples where employees whose behaviors made it difficult for them to get along with colleagues were transferred to different jobs or other departments rather than addressing the behavioral issue. Sometimes the jobs were "created" as a solution to the behavior problem even though the organizational need for that position had not been previously identified, and sometimes they brought with them a rate of pay that was higher than that of the new position, creating inequities.
Classification and compensation system aside, we also have been dealing with legacy issues where employees were allowed to elect work schedules that really don't meet the needs of the library and aren't fair to their colleagues because it is hard to tell an employee "if you can't work when we need you, then maybe you need to work somewhere else"; interpersonal friction that is getting in the way of productive work; and employees who don't like certain parts of their job and have been allowed to get away with not doing them.
Dealing with behavioral and performance issues in a disciplined way that is fair to both the organization (i.e. supports effective and efficient operations) and to employees (and not just the employee with the undesirable behavior) is HARD! It takes courage to set clear performance and behavior expectations and then hold people accountable.
This week I have been particularly proud of some of our newer Managers as they have stepped up to the plate to address some of these issues in their departments – not by "tweaking the system" but by having the difficult conversations about expectations and behavior. On the whole our PVLD management team is young and relatively inexperienced so as the District Director I have been curious to see how they would handle some of these issues – the answer is firmly, fairly and with a demonstrable commitment to making PVLD both a high performing organization and one that is a great place to work.
To the taxpayers, volunteers, and donors who support PVLD - you can rest assured that the various parts of the library district are in good hands.
To the PVLD Managers who are reading this – thank you!
Recent Comments