A couple of days ago the Fast Company blog posted this article about the relaunch of Ask.com. In its new incarnation people will be able to post questions and Ask.com will crawl the web to compile answers from other sites that connect questioners with human "experts", like Yahoo Answers. If no good match can be found on the web the question will posted for response by any member of the Ask.com community.
Leaving aside the issue of how a questioner would verify the qualifications of the human responders, I thought this statement was particularly telling -
"Ask.com can't compete with Google on sheer algorithmic muscle; nobody can, really. But there are chinks in Google's armor, chinks Google itself is perfectly aware of. Google knows that curated answers can often be more useful..." [emphasis mine]
Librarians may not be experts in a particular specialized field of knowledge per se they are experts in finding, validating, and curating information. Curating answers is a large part of what we currently do, and maybe an even larger part of our professional self-identity.
The challenge is that to date, at least as far as public libraries are concerned, we mostly provide those curated answers to people who walk through our doors, or maybe call us on the phone. A number of libraries, PVLD included, have experimented with other channels such as websites ("Ask A Librarian"), instant messaging/chat, and text messaging but everything I have seen or read indicates that the volume of questions through these channels is a very small proportion of the total questions that we answer. Not to mention that the total questions answered is on a long-term downward trend.
It seems to me that if libraries and librarians want to hold on to providing curated answers as a key part of our value proposition and professional identitiy we nee to establish ourselves on the Web as a trusted source of answers, something we have not managed to do after many years of trying. Ask.com says that it has 90 million visitors monthly...that is nearly 3x the total number of reference questions answered by California libraries of all types through all channels in a year! And what about the people who go to Yahoo Answers, ChaCha or other online sources of curated answers.
What would it take to get even 10% of the people who use commercial "answer" sites to turn to libraries instead? Some of the things that come to my mind -
- A single web-based portal for all libraries (or at least all public libraries) designed by people with real consumer user interface experience, not librarians (we tend all too often to design things the way we think they should work!) and that can be easily accessed by mobile devices, tablet computers, etc. as well as traditional computers. This probably also means development of apps for a variety of platforms as well.
- Effective use of search engine optimization (SEO) techniques to ensure that when someone searches Google, Bing, or any other search engine the library website is near the top of the list. This probably requires employing SEO experts on an ongoing basis.
- Investment in consumer marketing including web advertising (such as becoming a "sponsored link" on Google), as well as in other forms of advertising and marketing.
- A way of harnessing the collective knowledge and skills of librarians across time zones to provide extremely prompt, succinct and high quality answers (actual answers, not bibliographies and references to where to find information!) to questions as soon as they are posted...live and in real time.
In other words, it will require a significant investment of hard cash and time, the engagement of a whole set of non-librarian professional skills (e.g. user interface design, app design, SEO, consumer marketing) and a level of collaboration (even to agree on the design of the system) that is rare.
Is it possible? Maybe. Should we hang our hats on a future where providing answers remains at the core of our value proposition? I'm not so sure....
Recent Comments